STATISTICAL BRIEF #131
Elizabeth Stranges, M.S., Lauren M. Wier, M.P.H., and Anne Elixhauser, Ph.D.
In 2008, 94.1 percent of hospital stays for childbirth involved complicating conditions, such as umbilical cord complications, perineal lacerations, previous cesarean section, abnormality in fetal heart rate or rhythm, and problems of the amniotic cavity.1 Some of these conditions are pre-existing diagnoses that can represent risk factors; others are complications of care, including complications associated with the mode of delivery. Complicating conditions can pose a serious risk to both maternal and infant health, and are associated with various adverse outcomes.2 Understanding the complicating conditions associated with delivery—both vaginal delivery and Cesarean section (C-section)—is an important step towards the goal of reducing the rates of these complications.3 While some conditions identified here may affect which mode of delivery is used, other conditions may result from the delivery itself. This report does not explicitly distinguish between these types of pre-existing conditions and complications of care because of limitations in the data.
This Statistical Brief presents data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) on hospitalizations for childbirth with and without complicating conditions in 2009. It examines stays for both vaginal deliveries and Cesarean sections and compares rates of complicating conditions among both types of stays. All data are reported from the maternal perspective (i.e., reflecting the experience of the mother, not the newborn). For the purpose of this Brief, "complicating conditions" include all ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes that are in the section entitled "Complications of Pregnancy, Childbirth, and the Puerperium" as outlined under "Definitions".4
This Brief presents information on hospital utilization and patient characteristics for complicated and uncomplicated vaginal deliveries and C-sections. In addition, this report provides information on specific types of complicating conditions of delivery. During an individual stay, multiple complicating conditions may be recorded; some may be recorded as the principal diagnosis and some may be recorded as secondary diagnoses. All differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or better.
There were 4.1 million hospital stays involving childbirth among females 15 to 44 years old in 2009. As shown in table 1, vaginal deliveries accounted for approximately two-thirds of these stays (66.5 percent) while C-section deliveries accounted for the remainder (33.5 percent). The vast majority of both types of stays listed at least one complicating condition (91.3 percent of vaginal delivery stays; 99.9 percent of C-section stays). Only 1,300 C-section deliveries included no complicating conditions on the record.
Maternal stays for vaginal deliveries tended to be shorter and less expensive than C-section stays. Vaginal deliveries with complicating conditions were more costly than those without complicating conditions, and C-section deliveries were the most expensive. Length of stay for vaginal delivery stays without complicating conditions (1.9 days) was shorter than for vaginal delivery stays with complicating conditions (2.2 days). C-sections deliveries had the longest length of stay at 3.5 days. In aggregate, maternal stays for childbirth cost $15.9 billion, about 4.4 percent of community hospital costs in the United States (data not shown).
On average, women hospitalized for vaginal deliveries without complicating conditions were younger (25.3 years) than women receiving C-section deliveries (28.6 years). There was no difference in average age between C-sections and vaginal deliveries with complicating conditions.
Table 1 shows that Medicaid and private insurance were the most common expected payers for all delivery stays. Medicaid was billed for the majority of vaginal delivery stays without complicating conditions (56.3 percent), while private insurance paid for 36.0 percent of these stays. Private insurance paid for a larger share of vaginal delivery stays with complicating conditions (47.9 percent), while Medicaid paid for less than half of these stays (44.4 percent). Among C-section deliveries, private insurance was the predominant payer, covering 51.8 percent, while Medicaid paid for 41.6 percent.
The rates of different types of deliveries were similar across location, community income level, and region (data not shown).5
|Table 1. Delivery stays with and without complicating conditions*, 2009|
|Vaginal deliveries||Cesarean section deliveries†|
|With complicating conditions||Without complicating conditions|
|Total number of discharges||2,485,700||237,100||1,373,300|
|(Percentage of all childbirth stays)||60.7%||5.8%||33.5%|
|Rate per 1,000 population1||40.1||3.8||22.1|
|Mean length of stay, days||2.2||1.9||3.5|
|Mean hospital costs||$3,200||$2,600||$5,300|
|Aggregate costs (billions)||$8.0||$0.6||$7.3|
|Mean age, years||27.1||25.3||28.6|
|Health insurance (percentage distribution)|
|Source: AHRQ, Center for Delivery, Organization, and Markets, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2009|
* Complicating conditions include all conditions that are categorized as complications of pregnancy, delivery, or the puerperium based on ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes.
† Excludes 1,300 C-section deliveries for which no complicating conditions were indicated on the record.
1 Females ages 15 to 44.
Note: Counts of hospital stays are based on all-listed diagnoses, but each stay is counted only once.
Figure 1 presents the distribution of each type of childbirth stay by maternal age; stays for which "advanced maternal age" was the only complicating condition are included in the "without complicating conditions" categories here.
Among the 2.5 million vaginal deliveries with complicating conditions, women between the ages of 18 and 29 years accounted for over two-thirds of cases—37.7 percent were for females 18-24 years old and 30.1 percent of these stays were for females 25-29 years old. Females over 35 accounted for less than 10 percent of vaginal deliveries with complicating conditions.
In contrast, the 1.4 million stays for C-sections with complicating conditions were more evenly distributed across three age groups: 18-24, 25-29, and 30-34 years old. Only about half of cases were in the 18-29 year age ranges—26.2 percent were for 18-24 year olds and 27.2 percent were for 25-29 year olds. Females over age 35 accounted for almost 20 percent of C-sections.
Figure 1. Percentage distribution of childbirth stays with and without complicating conditions‡ by age group, 2009*. Stacked column bar chart; vaginal deliveries without complicating conditions (0.3 million), ages 15-17 percent, ##; ages 18 to 24, 33.3%; ages 25 to 29, 28.3%; ages 30 to 34, 22.4%; ages 35 to 39, 10.2%; ages 40-44, ## % . Vaginal deliveries with complicating conditions (2.5 million), ages 15-17 percent, ##; ages 18 to 24, 37.7%; ages 25 to 29, 30.1%; ages 30 to 34, 19.3%; ages 35 to 39, 8.2%; ages 40-44, ## % . C-section deliveries with complicating conditions (1.4 million), ages 15-17 percent, ##; ages 18 to 24, 26.2%; ages 25 to 29, 27.2%; ages 30 to 34, 25.6%; ages 35 to 39, 15.2%; ages 40-44, ## % . ‡Stays for which advanced maternal age was the only complicating condition are included in the "without complicating conditions" category. *Excludes 2,100 C-section deliveries for which no complicating conditions were indicated on the record. Note: Bar segments representing 4 percent or less are not labeled. Source: AHRQ, Center for Delivery, Organization, and Markets, Healthcare Costs and Utilization Project, Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2009.
Rates and characteristics of complicating conditions, 2009
Table 2 shows the rates of complicating conditions among delivery stays. This table provides a complete accounting of all complicating conditions regardless of their severity, time of onset, or cause.
Vaginal delivery stays
Among maternal stays with vaginal delivery, the following common complicating conditions occurred at a rate of 100 or more for every 1,000 deliveries:
Among maternal stays with C-section, the following common complicating conditions occurred at a rate of 100 or more for every 1,000 deliveries:
|Table 2. Counts, rates, and mean maternal age for all-listed complicating conditions for delivery stays, by delivery mode, 2009|
|Complicating conditions for delivery stays|
|Vaginal delivery||Cesarean delivery|
|Number||Rate per 1,000 stays||Mean age||Number||Rate per 1,000 stays||Mean age|
|Complications mainly related to pregnancy||1,499,250||603.2||27.1||866,710||631.1||28.6|
|Hemorrhage during pregnancy; abruptio placenta; placenta previa||26,050||10.5||27.4||47,220||34.4||29.6|
|Other hemorrhage during pregnancy; childbirth and the puerperium||5,820||2.3||27.0||45,000||3.5||29.1|
|Hypertension complicating pregnancy; childbirth and the puerperium||190,590||76.7||27.3||188,510||137.3||28.8|
|Preeclampsia and eclampsia||74,820||30.1||26.4||95,320||69.4||28.2|
|Other hypertension in pregnancy||117,910||47.4||27.8||96,250||70.1||29.5|
|Early or threatened labor||164,720||66.3||26.5||136,010||99.0||28.7|
|Early onset of delivery||163,820||65.9||26.5||135,830||98.9||28.8|
|Diabetes or abnormal glucose tolerance complicating pregnancy; childbirth; or the puerperium||136,230||54.8||30.2||128,590||93.6||31.1|
|Other complications of pregnancy||1,043,140||419.7||26.9||613,620||446.8||28.6|
|Infections of genitourinary tract during pregnancy||24,800||10.0||25.2||17,460||12.7||27.2|
|Anemia during pregnancy||233,250||93.8||25.7||182,860||133.2||27.8|
|Infectious and parasitic complications in mother affecting pregnancy||73,230||29.5||26.7||46,580||33.9||28.0|
|Other and unspecified complications of pregnancy||853,910||343.5||27.2||486,090||354.0||28.8|
|Indications for care in pregnancy; labor; and delivery||565,650||227.6||27.5||1,138,580||829.1||28.7|
|Other malposition; malpresentation||49,400||19.9||27.2||148,070||107.8||28.7|
|Fetopelvic disproportion; obstruction||74,690||30.0||27.3||120,850||88.0||27.0|
|Other disproportion or obstruction||73,610||29.6||27.3||78,790||57.4||27.4|
|Previous cesarean section||56,810||22.9||29.9||612,170||445.8||29.8|
|Fetal distress and abnormal forces of labor||175,960||70.8||27.7||254,520||185.3||27.0|
|Other abnormal forces of labor||30,040||12.1||27.7||10,470||7.6||28.2|
|Problems of amniotic cavity||263,000||105.8||27.2||173,560||126.4||28.3|
|Premature rupture of membranes||97,970||39.4||27.5||49,530||36.1||28.8|
|Infection of amniotic cavity||34,880||14.0||26.0||34,610||25.2||26.9|
|Other problems of amniotic cavity||141,200||56.8||27.3||99,820||72.7||28.6|
|Complications during labor||1,748,440||703.4||27.2||224,380||163.4||28.8|
|Umbilical cord complication||670,100||269.6||27.3||219,940||160.2||28.8|
|Cord around neck with compression||120,650||48.5||27.5||32,670||23.8||28.4|
|Other and unspecified cord entanglement with or without compression||520,310||209.3||27.3||171,490||124.9||28.9|
|Other umbilical cord complications||36,200||14.6||27.4||19,920||14.5||28.7|
|Trauma to perineum and vulva||1,412,610||568.3||27.2||-||-||-|
|First degree perineal laceration||613,380||246.8||26.8||-||-||-|
|Second degree perineal laceration||641,140||257.9||27.9||-||-||-|
|Third degree perineal laceration||68,790||27.7||27.4||-||-||-|
|Fourth degree perineal laceration||17,540||7.1||26.2||-||-||-|
|Other perineal laceration and trauma||114,830||46.2||25.8||-||-||-|
|Other complications of birth; puerperium affecting management of mother||1,024,860||412.3||28.6||713,800||519.8||29.8|
|Complications of the puerperium||39,940||16.1||28.0||45,250||33.0||28.6|
|Other obstetrical trauma||72,090||29.0||25.8||11,630||8.5||30.1|
|Other and unspecified complications of birth; puerperium affecting management of mother||850,910||342.3||29.1||632,020||460.2||30.1|
|Poor fetal growth*||43,510||17.5||25.8||38,710||28.2||28.0|
|Excessive fetal growth*||37,870||15.2||28.8||65,170||47.5||28.9|
|Advanced maternal age (35 years and older)*||217,430||87.5||37.5||160,570||116.9||37.7|
|Abnormality in fetal heart rate or rhythm*||309,910||124.7||26.9||254,200||185.1||27.6|
|Insufficient prenatal care*||73,900||29.7||24.5||25,980||18.9||26.0|
|Source: AHRQ, Center for Delivery, Organization, and Markets, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2009|
- Indicates fewer than 5,000 weighted discharges.
† Postpartum hemorrhage is defined as blood loss greater than 500 cc for vaginal delivery and greater than 1000cc for C-section delivery. Source: Baskett TF. Complications of the third stage of labour. In: Essential Management of Obstetrical Emergencies. 3rd ed. Bristol, England: Clinical Press; 1999:196-201.
‡ Following intrauterine fetal death, the standard of care suggests that vaginal delivery with induction should be offered to the patient thus most deliveries following intrauterine death will be vaginal. Source: ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 102: management of stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;113(3):748-61.
Note: Condition counts are based on all-listed diagnoses and are not mutually exclusive; multiple conditions can be listed during a single hospital stay. Information is suppressed for conditions with frequencies less than 5,000. All categories are based on the multi-level CCS, except for categories indicated with *, which is based on ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes.
Differences in rates of complicating conditions between stays with vaginal delivery and C-section
Rates for the following complicating conditions were at least twice as high among C-section stays as among vaginal delivery stays. Some of these complicating conditions may represent indications for C-section:
Rates for umbilical cord around the neck with compression were nearly twice as high among vaginal deliveries (270 per 1,000 stays) as among C-section deliveries (160 per 1,000 stays).
Data SourceThe estimates in this Statistical Brief are based upon data from the 2009 HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Supplemental sources included data from the U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, Annual Estimates of the Population for the United States, Regions, and Divisions and U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, P60-226, Coverage by Type of Health Insurance.
Many hypothesis tests were conducted for this Statistical Brief. Thus, to decrease the number of false-positive results, we reduced the significance level to 0.0001 for individual tests.
DefinitionsDiagnoses, ICD-9-CM, and Clinical Classifications Software (CCS)
The principal diagnosis is that condition established after study to be chiefly responsible for the patient's admission to the hospital. Secondary diagnoses are concomitant conditions that coexist at the time of admission or that develop during the stay.
ICD-9-CM is the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, which assigns numeric codes to diagnoses. There are about 13,600 ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes.
CCS categorizes ICD-9-CM diagnoses into a manageable number of clinically meaningful categories.6 This "clinical grouper" makes it easier to quickly understand patterns of diagnoses and procedures. For table 2, the Multi-Level CCS was used to examine more specific categories of conditions. The Multi-Level CCS is a hierarchical system that is defined using both single-level CCS groupings and ICD-9-CM codes.
For this report, CCS codes 177-195 were used to identify complicating conditions of pregnancy and childbirth. Delivery stays were identified by ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes 640.0-676.9, where the fifth digit is 1 or 2, or ICD-9-CM 650. Maternal stays were identified as having an all-listed ICD-9-CM diagnosis code in the delivery range or an all-listed CCS code 177-195. All stays were limited to patients ages 15 to 44 years.
Types of hospitals included in HCUP
HCUP is based on data from community hospitals, defined as short-term, non-Federal, general and other hospitals, excluding hospital units of other institutions (e.g., prisons). HCUP data include obstetrics and gynecology, otolaryngology, orthopedic, cancer, pediatric, public, and academic medical hospitals. Excluded are long-term care, rehabilitation, psychiatric, and alcoholism and chemical dependency hospitals. However, if a patient received long-term care, rehabilitation, or treatment for psychiatric or chemical dependency conditions in a community hospital, the discharge record for that stay will be included in the NIS.
Unit of analysis
The unit of analysis is the hospital discharge (i.e., the hospital stay), not a person or patient. This means that a person who is admitted to the hospital multiple times in one year will be counted each time as a separate "discharge" from the hospital.
Costs and charges
Total hospital charges were converted to costs using HCUP Cost-to-Charge Ratios based on hospital accounting reports from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).7 Costs will tend to reflect the actual costs of production, while charges represent what the hospital billed for the case. For each hospital, a hospital-wide cost-to-charge ratio is used because detailed charges are not available across all HCUP States. Hospital charges reflect the amount the hospital charged for the entire hospital stay and does not include professional (physician) fees. For the purposes of this Statistical Brief, costs are reported to the nearest hundred.
Payer is the expected primary payer for the hospital stay. To make coding uniform across all HCUP data sources, payer combines detailed categories into more general groups:
HCUP is a family of powerful health care databases, software tools, and products for advancing research. Sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), HCUP includes the largest all-payer encounter-level collection of longitudinal health care data (inpatient, ambulatory surgery, and emergency department) in the United States, beginning in 1988. HCUP is a Federal-State-Industry Partnership that brings together the data collection efforts of many organizations—such as State data organizations, hospital associations, private data organizations, and the Federal government—to create a national information resource.
HCUP would not be possible without the contributions of the following data collection Partners from across the United States:
Alaska State Hospital and Nursing Home Association
Arizona Department of Health Services
Arkansas Department of Health
California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development
Colorado Hospital Association
Connecticut Hospital Association
Florida Agency for Health Care Administration
Georgia Hospital Association
Hawaii Health Information Corporation
Illinois Department of Public Health
Indiana Hospital Association
Iowa Hospital Association
Kansas Hospital Association
Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals
Maine Health Data Organization
Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission
Massachusetts Division of Health Care Finance and Policy
Michigan Health & Hospital Association
Minnesota Hospital Association
Mississippi Department of Health
Missouri Hospital Industry Data Institute
Montana MHA — An Association of Montana Health Care Providers
Nebraska Hospital Association
Nevada Department of Health and Human Services
New Hampshire Department of Health & Human Services
New Jersey Department of Health
New Mexico Health Policy Commission
New York State Department of Health
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services
Ohio Hospital Association
Oklahoma State Department of Health
Oregon Health Policy and Research
Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council
Rhode Island Department of Health
South Carolina State Budget & Control Board
South Dakota Association of Healthcare Organizations
Tennessee Hospital Association
Texas Department of State Health Services
Utah Department of Health
Vermont Association of Hospitals and Health Systems
Virginia Health Information
Washington State Department of Health
West Virginia Health Care Authority
Wisconsin Department of Health Services
Wyoming Hospital Association
About the NIS
The HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) is a nationwide database of hospital inpatient stays. The NIS is nationally representative of all community hospitals (i.e., short-term, non-Federal, nonrehabilitation hospitals). The NIS is a sample of hospitals and includes all patients from each hospital, regardless of payer. It is drawn from a sampling frame that contains hospitals comprising about 95 percent of all discharges in the United States. The vast size of the NIS allows the study of topics at both the national and regional levels for specific subgroups of patients. In addition, NIS data are standardized across years to facilitate ease of use.
For More Information
For more information about HCUP, visit http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov.
For additional HCUP statistics, visit HCUPnet, our interactive query system, at www.hcup.ahrq.gov.
For information on other hospitalizations in the U.S., download HCUP Facts and Figures: Statistics on Hospital-Based Care in the United States in 2009, located at http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports.jsp.
For a detailed description of HCUP, more information on the design of the NIS, and methods to calculate estimates, please refer to the following publications:
Introduction to the HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2009. Online. May 2011. U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/NIS_2009_INTRODUCTION.pdf . (Accessed March 15, 2012).
Houchens, R., Elixhauser, A. Final Report on Calculating Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) Variances, 2001. HCUP Methods Series Report #2003-2. Online. June 2005 (revised June 6, 2005). U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/CalculatingNISVariances200106092005.pdf. (Accessed March 15, 2012).
Stranges, E. (Thomson Reuters), Wier, L.M. (Thomson Reuters) and Elixhauser, A. (AHRQ). Complicating Conditions of Vaginal Deliveries and Cesarean Sections, 2009. HCUP Statistical Brief #131. May 2012. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Rockville, MD. Available at http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb131.pdf. (Accessed March 15, 2012)
The authors would like to acknowledge Minya Sheng for her assistance on this Brief.
***AHRQ welcomes questions and comments from readers of this publication who are interested in obtaining more information about access, cost, use, financing, and quality of health care in the United States. We also invite you to tell us how you are using this Statistical Brief and other HCUP data and tools, and to share suggestions on how HCUP products might be enhanced to further meet your needs. Please e-mail us at email@example.com or send a letter to the address below:
Irene Fraser, Ph.D., Director
Center for Delivery, Organization, and Markets
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
540 Gaither Road
Rockville, MD 20850
1 Elixhauser, A. and Wier, L.M. Complicating Conditions of Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2008. HCUP Statistical Brief #113. May 2011. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available at http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb113.pdf. (Accessed March 15, 2012).
2 American Pregnancy Association, Pregnancy Complications. Available at http://www.americanpregnancy.org/pregnancycomplications. (Accessed March 15, 2012).
3 An objective of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services' Healthy People 2020 is to reduce maternal illness and complications related to pregnancy during hospitalization for labor and delivery (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Maternal, Infant, and Child Health). Available at http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/objectiveslist.aspx?topicid=26. (Accessed March 15, 2012).
4 This classification of pregnancy-associated complicating conditions is more inclusive than those diagnoses considered complications by Diagnostic Related Group (DRG) codes. Depending on the DRG assignment, an ICD-9-CM pregnancy or delivery complication code may not be considered a complication. For example, the following ICD-9-CM codes all fall into DRG 775 -"Vaginal delivery without complicating diagnoses" but are listed as complications based on ICD-9-CM codes:
64311-hyperemesis gravidarum with metabolic disturbance
64321-late vomiting of pregnancy
64622-renal disease not otherwise specified
64881-abnormal glucose tolerance
5 The rate of C-section deliveries with complications was higher in large fringe metro areas than in medium and small metro areas. Hospitalization rates for vaginal deliveries without complicating conditions were highest in the poorest communities and declined with increasing income. Rates of vaginal deliveries without complicating conditions were higher in the South than in the Northeast and Midwest.
6 HCUP Clinical Classifications Software (CCS). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). December 2009. U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available at www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/ccs/ccs.jsp. Updated March 2012. (Accessed March 15, 2012).
7 HCUP Cost-to-Charge Ratio Files (CCR). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). 2001-2009. U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Updated August 2011. Available at www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/state/costtocharge.jsp. (Accessed March 15, 2012).
|Internet Citation: Statistical Brief #131. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). May 2012. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb131.jsp.|
|Are you having problems viewing or printing pages on this Website?|
|If you have comments, suggestions, and/or questions, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.|
|Privacy Notice, Viewers & Players|
|Last modified 5/4/12|