| LOS_X - Length of stay, as received from data source |
| Documentation Sections: |
| General Notes |
| Uniform Values |
| State Specific Notes |
| General Notes |
|
Length of stay (LOS_X) is calculated by subtracting the admission date (ADATE) from the discharge date (DDATE). Same-day stays are therefore coded as 0. Leave days are not subtracted. Before edit checks are performed, LOS and LOS_X have the same value. If LOS is set to inconsistent (.C), the value of LOS_X is retained. LOS_X may contain negative or excessively large values. LOS_X is not equal to the calculated value in the following cases:
|
| Top |
| Uniform Values | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| Top | ||||||||||||||
| State Specific Notes |
|
Arkansas Only the calculated length of stay could be used to assign LOS_X because Arkansas did not report length of stay. Arizona Beginning in 1995, the source reports same-day stays as zero days so the supplied length of stay was used to assign LOS_X when length of stay could not be calculated from dates. Prior to 1995, the reported length of stay was not used when LOS_X could not be calculated because Arizona coded same-day stays with a value of 1 and subtracted days of absence from LOS. Beginning with 2005, reported length of stay is no longer supplied. Colorado Beginning in 2007, the reported length of stay was used when LOS could not be calculated during the HCUP processing. The reported length of stay was not used when LOS_X could not be calculated because Colorado:
Connecticut Length of stay could not be calculated from dates since Connecticut did not report full admission and discharge dates. During HCUP processing, the reported length of stay and a flag which indicates same-day stays were used to assign LOS_X. If the same-day flag was not coded, the reported length of stay was retained as supplied (i.e., if the reported length of stay was 1, and the same-day flag is not coded, then LOS_X is set to 1 and not reset to 0). Florida Beginning in 2004, Florida provided admission date (ADATE) and discharge date (DDATE) the supplied length of stay was used when LOS and LOS_X could not be calculated from the supplied dates. In 2000-2003, the supplied length of stay was used to assign LOS and LOS_X because Florida did not provide the admission and discharge date necessary for calculating length of stay. The supplied length of stay was coded according to the HCUP standard that assigns a length of stay of zero (0) to same day stays. In 1997-1999, the coding of LOS and LOS_X is inconsistent with the coding of length of stay in other states. Florida provided the reported length of stay but not the admission and discharge date necessary for calculating LOS_X. Florida codes same-day stays as LOS_X=1; the HCUP standard coding of same-day stays is LOS_X=0. Usually 2% of a states' discharges are same-day stays. Prior to 1997, the supplied length of stay was not used when length of stay could not be calculated because Florida:
Georgia Beginning with the 2001 data, Georgia no longer codes same day stays with a value of 1. Reported length of stay is used when length of stay cannot be calculated. Prior to 2001, the reported length of stay was not used when LOS_X could not be calculated because Georgia coded same-day stays with a value of 1. Hawaii Only the calculated length of stay could be used to assign LOS_X because Hawaii did not supply reported length of stay. Illinois The supplied length of stay was not used when length of stay could not be calculated because Illinois coded same-day stays with a value of 1. Illinois Length of stay was calculated during the HCUP processing. Iowa Prior to 2007, the reported length of stay was not used when LOS could not be calculated because Iowa coded same-day stays with a value of 1. Beginning in 2007, the reported length of stay was used when LOS could not be calculated during the HCUP processing. Indiana Only the calculated length of stay could be used to assign LOS_X because Indiana codes same day stays with a value of 1. Kansas The reported length of stay was not used when length of stay could not be calculated because Kansas coded same-day stays with a value of 1. Kentucky The reported length of stay was not used when LOS_X could not be calculated because Kentucky coded same-day stays with a value of 1. Massachusetts The supplied length of stay was not used when LOS could not be calculated because Massachusetts:
Maine The supplied length of stay was not used when length of stay could not be calculated because Maine coded same-day stays with a value of 1. Michigan Prior to 2001, length of stay could not be calculated from dates because Michigan did not report admission or discharge dates. During HCUP processing, only the reported length of stay could be used to assign LOS. Caution: If LOS_X = 365, then the stay may be longer than a year. Michigan uses the value 365 for stays that are greater than equal 364 days. Minnesota The reported length of stay was not used when LOS_X could not be calculated because Minnesota coded same-day stays with the value 1. Missouri The reported length of stay was not used when LOS_X could not be calculated because Missouri coded same-day stays with a value of 1. Nebraska The reported length of stay was not used when LOS_X could not be calculated because Nebraska coded same-day stays with the value 1. Nevada Only the calculated length of stay could be used to assign LOS_X because Nevada codes same day stays with a value of 1. New Hampshire Only the calculated length of stay could be used to assign LOS_X because New Hampshire codes same day stays with a value of 1. New York The assignment of LOS and LOS_X varies by year in New York:
*Beginning with the 2005 New York identifies AIDS/HIV records by ICD-9-CM diagnosis code or DRG:
*For 1998- 2004 data, New York identifies AIDS/HIV records by ICD-9-CM diagnosis code or DRG:
Please note that the admitting diagnosis is not retained in the HCUP databases. North Carolina The reported length of stay was not used when LOS_X could not be calculated because North Carolina coded same-day stays with the value 1. Ohio Only the calculated length of stay could be used to assign LOS_X because Ohio codes same day stays with a value of 1. Oregon Prior to 1994, the reported length of stay was assigned to LOS_X if dates were not available. However, the coding of same day stay varies: some Oregon hospitals report discharges on the day of admission as one day stay (LOS_X=1), in addition to reporting same day stays as zero days (LOS_X=0). Beginning in 1994, the reported length of stay was not used when length of stay could not be calculated from dates because Oregon coded all same-day stays as one day (LOS_X=1). Beginning in 2007, the reported length of stay was used if the calculated LOS was missing. Pennsylvania Prior to 1997, the reported length of stay was not used when length of stay could not be calculated because Pennsylvania coded same-day stays with the value 1. Beginning in 1997, Pennsylvania reports same-day stays as zero days. The supplied length of stay was used to assign LOS_X when length of stay could not be calculated from dates. Beginning in 2008, only the supplied length of stay was used to assign LOS_X because Pennsylvania did not supply admission or discharge date. South Carolina The reported length of stay was not used when LOS_X could not be calculated because South Carolina coded same-day stays with a value of 1. South Dakota Prior to 2007, only the calculated length of stay could be used to assign LOS_X because South Dakota codes same day stays with a value of 1. Beginning in 2007, regardless if same day stays are coded with a value of 1, the source provided length of stay is used when LOS could not be calculated from dates. Tennessee Only the calculated length of stay could be used to assign LOS_X because Tennessee did not report length of stay. Texas The reported length of stay was not used when LOS_X could not be calculated because Texas coded same-day stays with the value 1. Utah Prior to 2004, the reported length of stay was not used when LOS could not be calculated because Utah coded same-day stays with a value of 1. Beginning in 2004, Utah coded same day stays with a value of 0. Vermont The reported length of stay was not used when LOS_X could not be calculated because Vermont coded same-day stays with the value 1. Washington The reported length of stay was not used when length of stay could not be calculated because Washington:
West Virginia Beginning in 2001, West Virginia provides LOS_X. Prior to 2001, only the calculated length of stay was used to assign LOS_X because West Virginia did not provide the reported length of stay. Wisconsin For 1988-1994, the reported length of stay was not used when LOS could not be calculated because Wisconsin subtracted leave days and coded length of stay greater than 999 days as 999 days. Beginning with 1995, length of stay was not supplied. From 1995 - 2006, Wisconsin did not consistently supply length of stay - only the calculated length of stay was used to assign LOS and LOS_X. Beginning in 2007, we used the supplied length of stay to assign LOS and LOS_X when these fields could not be calculated from dates. |
| Top |
| Internet Citation: HCUP NIS Description of Data Elements. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). September 2008. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/vars/los_x/nisnote.jsp. |
| Are you having problems viewing or printing pages on this Website? |
| If you have comments, suggestions, and/or questions, please contact hcup@ahrq.gov. |
| Last modified 9/17/08 |